← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/35915/2024disposed of

Ankur Babbar v. State Of Haryana

2024-09-03Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-35915-2024 Date of Decision: September 03, 2024 ANKUR BABBAR ....Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA ....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL

Present:

Mr. Deepak Singh Saini, Advocate with Ms. Vamika Johar, Advocate, Ms. Parul Panchal, Advocate and Mr. Parul Saini, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. B.S. Virk, Senior DAG, Haryana.

**** SANDEEP MOUDGIL , J.(ORAL) The instant petition under Section 482 Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in FIR No.824, dated 19.08.2023, under Sections 406, 420 IPC, 1860 and Section 24 of the Immigration Act, registered at Police Station Sadar Karnal, District Karnal.

Mr. Ajaivir Singh, Advocate, puts in appearance on behalf of the complainant and has filed his Power of Attorney in Court, which is taken on record.

This Court vide order dated 29.07.2024 while issuing notice of motion, granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioner, subject to his joining the investigation.

SANGEETA 2024.09.03 20:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-35915-2024 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in pursuance to the order dated 29.07.2024, the petitioner has joined the investigation. Learned State counsel does not controvert the said fact and further submits that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. In view of the above, the order dated 29.07.2024 is made absolute.

Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE 03.09.2024 Sangeeta Whether reasoned/speaking:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No SANGEETA 2024.09.03 20:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document