Kusum Jain v. State Of Haryana And Another

2023:PHHC:100729 1.

2.

It is not even in dispute that the case pertains to the sale of some shops, the sale consideration of which was deposited in the account of the company where the petitioner is Director. The company is stated to be not even the owner of the shop. Despite that, the money was received in the account of the company. The police have filed the challan against the accused, including the present petitioner. Even the charges have been framed in the case. Therefore, it cannot be said that there is no prima SANDEEP GROVER 2023.08.04 16:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

-1-

2023:PHHC:100729 facie case against the petitioner or that the contents of the FIR do not disclose any offence against the petitioner.

3.

In view of the above, this Court does not find any ground to interfere in the matter. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. SANDEEP GROVER 2023.08.04 16:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

-2-