Topesh @ Vinay Tomar v. State Of Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH DECIDED ON: 16.09.2025 TOPESH @ VINAY KUMAR .....PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA .....RESPONDENT
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH.
Present:
Mr. Tarun Seth, Advocate and Ms. Deepshikha Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pawan Kumar Jhanda, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
*** SANJAY VASHISTH, J (ORAL) 1.
Prayer in this petition, filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 438 Cr.P.C.), is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, who has been booked in a criminal case arising out of First Information Report, as detailed hereunder:- Name of Petitioner (s) FIR No.
Date Section(s) Police Station District Topesh @ Vinay Kumar Aged about years 26.07.2024 25 of Arms Act BPTP Faridabad 2.
On 23.06.2025 following order was passed:- "1.
Prayer in this petition, filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 438 Cr.P.C.), is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, who has been booked in a criminal case arising out of First Information Report, as detailed hereunder:-
"## $ !
% ! & '
$()
& !
&& !& !* !!+
&& & & ! + (
+ & !, !* !!
!, ! - . & & + ! & & !
/ 0 # & & ! , !
!
&!
&& /
!!, + & !
1 !
&
! &
!
&
!
2 !
,
! !4) ,/ 6 78
!
& 9/
: &
5 ;<
&& / ! & &
,
!
!&
,&,
!
(
+ & !5
,
+ 1 ( ,
!
( , && & *
&5!
& !
3 ! && & &&! &
+ /!
=> "2//-= & /! -=>.#.> " ! +&
, ( ,
!
. ! ! 3+ +&
, !&
!
( & ! & ,
!
& +&: ."
3.
Continuing his submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that in compliance of the order dated 23.06.2025 passed by this Court, petitioner has joined the investigation, and has fully co-operated. Therefore, he prays for confirmation of the said interim anticipatory bail order. 4.
Learned State counsel, confirms the said averment made by counsel for the petitioner of joining the investigation on 01.08.2025 by the petitioner, and submits that as of now, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation.
5.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
6.
Since, petitioner has already joined the investigation and custodial interrogation is no more required; ad-interim bail order dated 23.06.2025 passed by this Court is hereby made absolute. Accordingly, present petition is allowed. However, petitioner shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the terms and conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.
7.
Accordingly, petition stands disposed of.
16.09.2025 (SANJAY VASHISTH) mahima JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No