Rashmi Sharma v. Haryana Urban Development Authority Etc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.25005 of 2018 Date of decision: 15.10.2019 Rashmi Sharma ..Petitioner

Versus

Haryana Urban Development Authority and others ..Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL

Present:

Mr. Lalit Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Deepak Balyan, Advocate for the respondents.

*** Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral) Short reply has been filed in the Court today and the same is taken on record.

Learned counsel for the respondents on the basis of short reply submits that the residential plot has been allotted. In view of submission made by learned counsel for the respondents and affidavit filed in the Court, the present petition has become infructuous.

Dismissed as having become infructuous.

(DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 15.10.2019 (SUDHIR MITTAL) neetu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned No Whether Reportable No NEETU RANI 2019.10.17 12:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh