Sukhwinder Kaur And Another v. State Of Punjab And Others
CRWP-6519-2026 --1-- 106 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6519-2026 Date of Decision: 01.06.2026 Sukhwinder Kaur and another .....Petitioners..
Versus
State of Punjab and ors.
.....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Present:
Mr. Digvijay Nagpal, Advocate, for the petitioners.
**** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) 1.
Present criminal writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioners praying for issuance of direction to official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and to restrain the private respondent No.4 and other family members not to harass or interfere in the peaceful life of the petitioners. 2.
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that instead of pressing the present petition on merits, his client would be satisfied in case direction is issued to the official respondents to decide the representation dated 23.05.2026 (Annexure P-3) moved at the instance of petitioners by passing a speaking order expeditiously. 3.
Prayer seems to be justified.
4.
Upon advance notice, Mr. Puru Jarewal, DAG, Punjab appears on SONIKA 2026.06.01 14:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CRWP-6519-2026 --2-- behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 and raises no objection to the innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioners.
5.
In view of the agreed stand taken by both sides, but without going into the merits of the controversy, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Bathinda to look into the representation dated 23.05.2026 (Annexure P-3) and decide the same in accordance with law by passing a speaking order preferably within a period of 02 (two) weeks from today.
01.06.2026 (HARKESH MANUJA) sonika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: yes/no Whether reportable?
yes/no SONIKA 2026.06.01 14:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document