Anil Kumar v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No. 26954 of 2017 Date of decision: 07.12.2017 Anil Kumar ....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA

Present:

Mr. Ashok Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner.

G.S.SANDHAWALIA, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks quashing of the transfer order dated 03.08.2017 (Annexure P-3) whereby, he has been transferred from Government Senior Secondary School, Nuh to Government High School, Bhadas (820), Block Nagina, District Mewat instead of Block Tauru. The grouse of the petitioner is that his merit was worked out at Sr. No. 6 i.e. 40.0192 points whereas, 2 persons namely Sandeep and Udey Pal had merit at Sr. Nos. 652 and 660. The petitioner had given preference for the Government High School, Patuka, Mewat (717) wherein, there were two posts but the said persons have been adjusted at the said places (page nos. 31 and 48 of the writ petition). It is the case of the petitioner that thereafter he also represented immediately on 05.08.2017 (Annexure P-4) and thereafter another representation was made on 25.09.2017 (Annexure P5) to respondent no.2 regarding this aspect but no action has been taken. Counsel further submits that he would be satisfied if the said representations are decided within a fixed time frame.

Notice of motion.

Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana accepts notice. Copy of Shivani Gupta 2017.12.08 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

-2the writ petition has been supplied to him. Keeping in view the above, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served to ask the respondents to file reply as the decision making process is still pending.

Accordingly, without commenting on the merits of the case or the entitlement of the petitioner for the abovesaid relief and keeping in view the fact that the matter is still pending consideration, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no. 2 to take a decision on the representations dated 05.08.2017 (Annexure P-4) and 25.09.2017 (Annexure P-5) within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. In case any adverse order is to be passed, a reasoned order be passed and conveyed to the petitioner. 07.12.2017 (G.S. SANDHAWALIA) shivani JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Shivani Gupta 2017.12.08 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document