High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/37819/2023disposed of

Jashanveer Singh And Others v. State Of Punjab And Others

2024-01-30Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi2 pages

2024:PHHC:012146 CRM-M-37819-2023 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-37819-2023 Date of decision: January 30, 2024 Jashanveer Singh and others ...... Petitioners Vs.

State of Punjab and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI

Present:

Mr. M.S. Longia, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Harkanwar Jeet Singh, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. N.S. Gill, Advocate for Mr. Manjinder Kumar, Advocate for respondents No.2.

***** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The prayer in this petition is for quashing of the FIR No.69 dated 19.06.2015 under Sections 307, 341, 324, 323, 506, 148 and 149 IPC (Section 307 IPC deleted and Sections 325 and 326 IPC added later on) registered at Police Station Sadar, District Rupnagar and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 21.07.2023 (Annexure P-2) entered into between the parties. Vide order dated 04.08.2023 this Court had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate for getting their statements recorded with regard to the compromise dated 21.07.2023 (Annexure P-2) and the Illaqa Magistrate/Trial Court was to submit a report in this regard giving certain details as enumerated in the said order. SATISH KUMAR 2024.01.30 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

2024:PHHC:012146 CRM-M-37819-2023 -2Pursuant to the order dated 04.08.2023 passed by this Court, parties have appeared before the Court of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Rupnagar and as per its report dated 05.12.2023 submitted to this Court, both the parties have got recorded their respective statements in Court. A perusal of the aforesaid report would show that the parties have effected a genuine compromise without there being any pressure, coercion or undue influence. In view of the compromise there is a remote possibility of the complainant coming forward to support the prosecution case. The powers under Section 482 Cr.PC can be exercised in such like situation in order to prevent unnecessary vagaries of criminal trial to be faced by the parties, when there are remote chances of conviction of the accused.

The compromise in question is found to be fully in consonance with the direction issued by the Court in Kulwinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., 2012(4) RCR (Crl.) 543. In view of the aforesaid report of the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Rupnagar accompanied by the joint statements of both the parties, the present FIR No.69 dated 19.06.2015 under Sections 307, 341, 324, 323, 506, 148 and 149 IPC (Section 307 IPC deleted and Sections 325 and 326 IPC added later on) registered at Police Station Sadar, District Rupnagar and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 21.07.2023 (Annexure P-2) entered into between the parties, are hereby, quashed.

Petition stands disposed of.

( JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE January 30, 2024 satish Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SATISH KUMAR 2024.01.30 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh