Sandeep Kumar And ANR v. State Of Punjab And Another









   

 



   

  !

"# $% &' () 
  



       
   



  
#

 *+ , -
 .

-





          

 !"

  

      
 

# $       Mr. Kanishak Sawarup, Advocate for respondent No.2. %%%% .

-



 )  /'(0# &'( !     
  )*+ ,  ,  

  " -  ./0 +11  '*''+2'3   
   1+1 1+) 1+3 1)/,       
  
 5

 

#

 6  -  

    

   



 &+( !./7        ,  
        '*''+2'3 

  8  "
      9    :  7 

      7     !$7 

7 7

8  !$   



    &1( ;1'++2+2 

7   

 

  /-   

 <

 

 



         

  7 

  



 '+)+2'4 &)( ! 

 )++2++  


#  5   

  5

    



 7 

   

7 

$      

     7  7 7!$ 

  

    &3( . 8   ,






    

   

!

"# =
 

     

   

     





  





 

 &>( The Supreme Court in Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others v. State of Gujarat and another, 2017 AIR (SC) 4843 laid down the broad principles governing the exercises of powers of quashing of FIR. It was held that the power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is to be exercised by the High Court to secure the ends of justice, to prevent abuse of any process of law and in cases where in view of the compromise the possibility of conviction is remote and continuation of proceeding will cause oppression and prejudice. [7] Mr. Kanishak Sawarup, Advocate appears on behalf of respondent No.2 and states that he has no objection if the FIR is quashed. He further states that the case against unidentified persons is not being pursued.

&*( The reason for the incident was the dispute relating to the business of the brick kiln. With the intervention of friends and relatives, parties have decided to take the path of forgive and forget and to proceed ahead rather than indulging in litigation. No useful purpose would be

served by continuing with the trial, to meet the ends of justice, the FIR mentioned above and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.

[9] The petition is allowed.

2.

-





 $% &' ()    '?  " <    @<0

+?  

  @<0