Rajinder Kaur v. Bank Of Baroda And ORS

CWP-26998-2017 -12023:PHHC:156274

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-26998-2017 Date of Decision : 07.12.2023 Rajinder Kaur ......... Petitioner

Versus

Bank of Baroda and others ......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present :

Mr.Gaurav Sethi, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. B.B.Bagga, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 4.

**** JAGMOHAN BANSAL , J. (Oral) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of Constitution of India is seeking direction to the respondent-bank to decide legal notice dated 26.12.2016 (Annexure P-13) and declare unauthorised leave period of 12 days as authorised leave period. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner, at this stage, would be redressed, if the respondents are directed to decide legal notice dated 26.12.2016 (Annexure P-13) in a time bound manner.

3.

Faced with this, learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 4 submits that the matter has already been thoroughly inquired and appropriate order stands passed, nevertheless, legal notice dated 26.12.2016 (Annexure P-13) of the petitioner would be re-looked and an appropriate order would be passed within six weeks from today. ANJU GOEL 2023.12.07 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-26998-2017 -22023:PHHC:156274 4.

In the wake of statement of learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 4, the present petition stands disposed of. ( JAGMOHAN BANSAL ) 07.12.2023 JUDGE anju Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No ANJU GOEL 2023.12.07 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document