Sher Pal Gujjar v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.217 CWP No.25334 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.03.2022 Sher Pal Gujjar

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. Ishaan Bhardwaj, Advocate for Mr. Vijay Pal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ankur Mittal, Addl. A.G., Haryana with Mr. Saurabh Mago, A.A.G., Haryana for respondent No.1.

Mr. Sandeep Singh Ghangas, Advocate for respondent No.2.

* * * * RITU BAHRI, J.

(ORAL) CM No.10720-CWP of 2019 This application has been filed under Section 151 CPC to place on record the reply filed on behalf of respondent No.2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the reply filed on behalf of respondent No.2 is taken on the record.

CWP No.25334 of 2018 Learned counsel for respondent No.2 has stated that the petitioner has challenged the order disqualifying him to contest the elections for the post of Sarpanch. However, the writ petition bearing CWP No.21288 of 2017 was dismissed keeping in view the fact that the NEETU RANI 2022.04.02 13:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC

CWP No.25334 of 2018 (O&M) -2- .....

fresh election has been held and new Sarpanch had already been elected on 28.02.2018. The said petition was dismissed as having been infructuous way back on 24.07.2019 and the said order, passed in the presence of the petitioner, has attained finality. In view of the above-discussed submission made by learned counsel for respondent No.2, the present petition also stands disposed of. (RITU BAHRI) JUDGE 29.03.2022 (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) neetu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETU RANI 2022.04.02 13:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC