High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/25377/2018disposed of

Ram Karan Singh Rathi v. State Of Haryana And ORS

2019-05-23Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi2 pages

CWP-25377-2018 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-25377-2018 Date of decision: - 23.05.2019 Ram Karan Singh Rathi ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present:- Mr. C.B. Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Charanjit Singh Bakhshi, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Dhruv Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Kuldeep Tiwari, Advocate for respondent No.4.

**** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) In the present writ petition, the grievance which is being raised by the petitioner is that he was made to discharge the duties of the post of Secretary A-Class from 14.11.2000 till 31.01.2010 and as he was discharging the duties of a higher post, he was entitled for the salary for the said post.

Though notice of motion was issued in this writ petition on 04.10.2018, but no reply has been filed on behalf of the respondents so far.

Counsel for the petitioner states that for the relief which has NARESH KUMAR 2019.05.24 17:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP-25377-2018 -2been sought in the present writ petition, petitioner has made a representation dated 07.09.2018 (Annexure P-7) to the respondents, which is still pending consideration with the respondents and the petitioner will be satisfied, at this stage, in case a time bound direction is issued to the respondents to decide the said representation by passing an appropriate speaking order in accordance with law. Counsel for the respondents states that the respondents have no objection in deciding the claim of the petitioner as being made by him in a representation in a time bound manner by passing a speaking order as per the settled principle of law.

In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case or the claim being made by the petitioner, the respondents are directed to decide the representation dated 07.09.2018 (Annexure P-7) by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. In case after the decision, it is found that the petitioner is entitled for any monetary benefit, the same shall also be released to him within a period of next three months.

Present writ petition stands disposed of.

( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) May 23, 2019 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking?

Yes Whether reportable?

No NARESH KUMAR 2019.05.24 17:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh