Harvinder Singh v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.6041 of 2016 Date of Decision: March 31, 2016 Harvinder Singh ....Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BAJANTHRI.

--- Present: Mr.Vikram Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.-

1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner has rushed to the Court against the Memo dated 05.02.2016 (P-7) which is nothing but only a report submitted by the Block Development and Panchayat Officer, Karnal to the Deputy Commissioner, Karnal for taking final decision as to whether or not the Gram Panchayat land measuring 8 marla where the petitioner is said to have raised structure, can be sold to him in accordance with Rule 12(4) of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Rules, 1964, as applicable to the State of Haryana.

We need mot to express any opinion on photograph No.2 at page 23 of the paper book at this stage MOHINDER KUMAR 2016.04.23 11:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No.6041 of 2016 [2] except to grant liberty to the petitioner to submit his objections against the impugned memo/report to the Deputy Commissioner, Karnal, who shall consider the same in accordance with law before taking any final decision. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. [SURYA KANT] JUDGE March 31, 2016 [P.B.BAJANTHRI] mohinder JUDGE MOHINDER KUMAR 2016.04.23 11:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh