Tek Ram v. State Of Haryana & ORS

Vinod Kumar 2017.12.07 10:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.27253 of 2017 Date of decision:30.11.2017 Tek Ram

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain

Present:

Mr. B.S.Chahar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

***** Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.

The petitioner has prayed for a writ in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondents to take suitable action against respondent no.5-Sarpanch for illegal encroachment over the panchayat land for his personal use. Counsel for the petitioner has though argued vehemently but failed to bring on record any cogent evidence to prove illegal encroachment/ possession of respondent no.5 on the land belonging to the Panchayat. In view thereof, I do not find any reason to interfere in the present petition and hence, the same is hereby dismissed being denuded of any merit, though without any order as to costs.

November 30, 2017 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) vinod* Judge Whether speaking / reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No