Desa Singh @ Jagdish Singh v. State Of Punjab And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.6983 of 2015 Date of Decision: November 20, 2015 Desa Singh @ Jagdish Singh ....Petitioner versus The State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HARI PAL VERMA.

--- Present: Mr.Naresh Kaushal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Rajesh Bhardwaj, Additional AG, Punjab.

Mr.Ashish Grover, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2to4. -.-

1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The matter pertains to allotment of a plot to the petitioner under the 'Oustee quota'. The petitioner's claim has been turned down vide the impugned order on the premise that he failed to apply within the stipulated period. Such a condition has been annulled by this Court in Haryana Urban Development Authority and others versus Sandeep and others, 2012(2) Law Herald (P&H).

In this view of the matter, the action of the authorities cannot sustain and the impugned order to that extent is set-aside. It is directed that as and when any advertisement is issued by GMADA, the petitioner shall be MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.11.28 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No.6983 of 2015 [2] eligible to apply in response thereto and his claim shall be considered on merits.

The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. [SURYA KANT] JUDGE November 20, 2015 [HARI PAL VERMA] mohinder JUDGE MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.11.28 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh