Sarita v. State Of Haryana & Others

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 1.

CWP No. 2737 of 2017 (O&M) Sarita ....Petitioner ..Respondents 2.

CWP No. 3830 of 2017 (O&M) Sushil Kumar Sharma ....Petitioner ..Respondents 3.

CWP No. 2995 of 2017 Babita 4.

CWP No. 4175 of 2017 (O&M) Sunita 5.

CWP No. 4231 of 2017 (O&M) Sweta Kumari and anr.

...Petitioners

6.

CWP No. 4702 of 2017 (O&M) Santosh Kumari 7.

CWP No. 5680 of 2017 (O&M) Poonam Rani

-28.

CWP No. 5728 of 2017 (O&M) Usha Yadav 09.

CWP No. 5805 of 2017 (O&M) Anu Dhiman 10.

CWP No. 4821 of 2017 (O&M) Jaswinder Kaur 11.

CWP No. 11149 of 2017 (O&M) Sombir Singh 12.

CWP No. 3506 of 2017 (O&M) Nadeem Ahmed 13.

CWP No. 7517 of 2017 (O&M) Neetu Rani Haryana Staff Selection Commission and anr.

14.

CWP No. 6230 of 2017 (O&M) Meena

-315.

CWP No. 6082 of 2017 (O&M) Mukesh 16.

CWP No. 15881 of 2017 (O&M) Paramjeet 17.

CWP No. 12636 of 2017 (O&M) Saroj 18.

CWP No. 3745 of 2017 (O&M) Gurvinder Kaur 19.

CWP No. 22472 of 2017 (O&M) Joginder Singh 20.

CWP No. 22369 of 2017 (O&M) Bimla Devi 21.

CWP No. 21799 of 2017 (O&M) Sunaina

-422.

CWP No. 22010 of 2017 (O&M) Narender Kumar 23.

CWP No. 22149 of 2017 (O&M) Nisha Kumari 24.

CWP No. 23124 of 2017 (O&M) Priyanka Devi and anr.

...Petitioners

25.

CWP No. 24543 of 2017 (O&M) Anand Singh Dahiya 26.

CWP No. 24545 of 2017 (O&M) Mohan Lal 27.

CWP No. 2895 of 2017 (O&M) Manjeet 28.

CWP No. 2994 of 2017 (O&M) Suman Devi

-529.

CWP No. 28537 of 2018 (O&M) Sandeep 30.

CWP No. 24653 of 2017 (O&M) Raj Bala Date of Decision:13.11.2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. Sushil Jain, Advocate Mr. S.K. Nehra, Advocate, Mr. Surinder Gaur, Advocate, Mr. Dharam Pal, Advocate for Mr. Madan Lal, Advocate, Mr. K.S. Banyana, Advocate, Mr. Sajjan Singh, Advocate , Mr. Aditya Dassur, Advocate, Mr. Surinder Jaipal, Advocate for Mr. Arjun Sheoran, Advocate, Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik, Advocate, Mr. Pardeep Sehrawat, Advocate for the petitioner (s) Ms. Shruti Jain, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Anurag Goyal, Advocate for respondents No. 4 to 13.

**** RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral) This order shall dispose of the above mentioned 29 petitions as common question of facts are involved in both the petitions. Pursuant to direction given by this Court on 12.10.2018, today an affidavit dated 10/12.11.2018 has been filed in the Court, which is taken on record. As per affidavit, out of 20 questions, 15 have already been

-6answered in favour of the petitioner in the revised answer key. With respect to remaining 5 answers, 4 answers were found to be correct as per the report submitted by the expert committee and with respect to one question i.e question No. 19 in Set A, question No. 6 in Set B, question No. 57 in Set C and question No. 35 in Set D is concerned, the Commission forwarded the objection of candidates to 3rd expert and as per opinion of the expert, the correct answer of question No. 19 in Set A, question No. 6 in Set B, question No. 57 in Set C and question No. 35 in Set D is 'D'. Since now all the obejctions of the petitioners have been decided by the Commssion, this petition is being disposed of by giving a direction to the respondent-Commission to upload the revised result of the candidates, within a period of four days from today. After uploading the revised result, the candidates who falls within the zone of consideration, they be called for interview for the post of PGT History.

(RITU BAHRI) JUDGE 13.11.2018 G Arora Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No