Tarsam Singh @ Sona v. State Of Punjab

CRM-M-39221-2020 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-39221-2020 (O&M) Date of decision : 25.08.2021 Tarsem Singh @ Sona

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN

Present:

Mr. Gurpal Singh Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. H.S. Multani, AAG, Punjab.

(Through Video Conferencing) ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN, J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.316 dated 19.09.2020, registered under Section 22 of NDPS Act, 1985 at Police Station Lambi, District Sri Muktsar Sahib. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in pursuance of the order dated 26.11.2020, the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer. He further submits that the petitioner was neither arrested at the spot nor any recovery was made as he was nominated on the disclosure statement of co-accused Gurpreet Singh.

Learned State counsel has filed the affidavit of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub-Division Malout, District Sri Muktsar Sahib and as per the affidavit, the factual position has not disputed. It is also not disputed that the petitioner is not involved in any other case. JYOTI 2021.08.26 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-39221-2020 (O&M) Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Sukhwinder Singh submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and no more required for any further investigation.

In view of the above, this petition is allowed and the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 26.11.2020 is made absolute subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. 25.08.2021 (ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN) Jyoti-II JUDGE Whether speaking / reasoned :

Yes No Whether Reportable :

Yes No JYOTI 2021.08.26 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document