Subhash Sharma v. Union Of India And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CM-19679-CWP-2021 in/and CWP No.25687 of 2018 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : 17th MAY, 2022 Subhash Sharma .... Petitioner

Versus

Union of India & others .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJBIR SEHRAWAT * * * * Present :

None for the petitioner.

Mr. Arvind Moudgil, Sr. Panel Counsel and Ms. Jyotika Panesar, Advocate for respondents-UOI. * * * * RAJBIR SEHRAWAT, J. (Oral) CM-19679-CWP-2021 This is an application filed by the respondent-UOI under Section 151 C.P.C. praying for disposing of the main petition as infructuous as the relief prayed for has already been granted. Notice of the application was issued on 02.02.2022. However, no reply has been filed by the non-applicant-petitioner. Moreover, there is no representation on behalf of petitioner today. The counsel for the respondent-UOI has pointed out that the relief claimed by the petitioner in the present petition has been granted to him.

In view of the above, the application stands allowed. RAJ KUMAR 2022.05.18 18:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP No.25687 of 2018 (O&M) -2CM-2780-CWP-2019 This is an application filed under Section 151 C.P.C. for staying order dated 05.10.2018 and directing the petitioner to join his duties at the place of transfer.

Since the main case is being disposed off, the application has been rendered infructuous and the same is disposed of as such. CWP No.25687 of 2018 In view of the fact that the application for dismissing the main petition as having been rendered infructuous, is allowed; and the relief claimed by the petitioner is granted to him, the present petition stands dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 17th MAY, 2022 'raj'

(RAJBIR SEHRAWAT) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes No Whether Reportable:

Yes No RAJ KUMAR 2022.05.18 18:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document