Amrit Lal Gupta v. State Of Haryana Through Additional Chief Secretary To The Government Of Haryana

CWP-18628-2026 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH (104) CWP-18628-2026 Date of Decision: - 01.07.2026 Amrit Lal Gupta and others ....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present:- Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana.

**** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1.

A perusal of the paper-book would show that in para 2 it has been stated that the petitioners are the owner of the land in question and a reference has been made to sale deed (Annexure P-1). A perusal of the said sale deed would show that it is the mother of the petitioners who was the owner of the property and in paragraph 3 of the writ petition, it has been stated that the petitioner's mother had taken compensation with respect to the said land. Further perusal of the paper-book would show that vide order dated 06.04.2015, the mother of the petitioners along with one Ram Rattan had filed CWP-117 of 2015 in which an order had been passed to the effect that in case a representation is filed by the petitioners therein within a period of two months from the passing of the said order, NARESH KUMAR 2026.07.02 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement

CWP-18628-2026 -2the same would be decided in accordance with law by passing a speaking order.

2.

Nothing has been stated in the present writ petition as to what transpired in pursuance of the above-said order. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition after giving full and better particulars. 4.

Dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty. 5.

It is made clear that in case any such writ petition is filed, the same would be considered independently in accordance with law. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE July 01, 2026 naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking?

Yes Whether reportable?

No NARESH KUMAR 2026.07.02 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement