United India Insurance Co v. Sonia & ORS

   
       

 !" # $#   ! %!& !" # $# 





'  ######(())*!+

# '

'# ###### ( !!+

,"

 -. ,'# '  '

',  



  




  

  

 

'

',

#

!

"



#

$ 

%
 &'

() &(!&

#


 
 



" #
* 



 


 

*


!++


 
 

!,-- . 
 
/
" #01
% 






%
  #












2 
!

3

 

4 )(!+((25
 $
% 

6
) 78

 


$ 
9 






#

 $
 

&


 

 










   
9 





%
#


" #

 

 









 
9 

#
 

 
 :

#  ', ''

 '



.   '.

 



'

"

 
 

5;


  






#


" #



 $ 



#

" 






#  %










#




%

'


 

 
 


2 
 %  
$







%


 %
 
 

2 
!

3


<=57,7(5&(!&
: $  







%



2 

" 


 








;



 
 




 % 
 

 

% 
 
#
 

'. ./ 

, ' 

+

> 0#
* 
 




Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Another 01 $2 '%( 4  % + * 

5  
 %

%

 











 


5 ?30
  

      

     

   

         

  

  

  
  



 



  

 

  

       

6

    !"#$      

 %#  !"&$       

 &'    !"($      

 


31
)

      

        *              (+,      

   







                 


 -

 

           

        

   

         $          .  /

 

     

     

            

  
*  

 

              



         

     
32
 

     

           (+,          

           (+,    

    
             



  

                                         

 

            
* * * * * * 42.)     

   

       &$        

     0

 1    $        !2    !(%+ %!%(

$ 

    

 3!4 %'#+

3!'#!#(

3!(#'&+

3!&&!&(

 3!#&'(+

  

    

 3!!(!((

35(''+

34 '!'(

 3(''4+

)

> 0#
* 
 




National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. 01 ' 3 5

 
 %

*


!++
!+35

!+-


 
 

!,--

  % $
5 .1 



 

 $
@
 


  A .B1 *



  
 $

$
A .1 $



# 
 
 $
  A

 .1 4 #
 $

 



   


 

   


@ % 


A .C1 <
 
 

$  

 

  
$
% 
 

#A
5  

 @  "

 




$ 

 

5 ?52. 6  conventional heads



  

   

 7/

8
*   7
%(+++  

7

!+++++    

       7  !+++++  

  

   


  

      

 

 
7/

 0   9 

 



         



             

  



   



 
:    

  

    
6         
       

 

     



  

      


   

  

  

 

 


; 

  

    

  

 

  

     

3  

    

        



                     

  
    

   

 * 

           

 

         

   

  

   

 

    

   7
!(+++
&++++ 7
!(+++

 
           

  
<       

   

 )       

    

 

 



  

  

 !+,   

)   

  



  

 

 

  = = = = = 59.3
)   

  (+,    



 



 /      &+

  


   #+, 



 

&+(+

* 

  

  (+'+

    !(,
       


59.4
* 







 $      &+,

 

7

  

  

 &+

6  %(,

  

 &+(+

 !+,

  

 (+'+



 

 


   

   

     

 
59.5
.             

    

     #+#%0> ?

    

    59.6.



               0  > @         &%     /


59.7
 

       
59.8
7   

        

  



 

   

    7  !(+++  7  &++++     7  !(+++

 
 

    

   !+,  

A - > 0#
* 
 




,*84* ! *)

!

% *!&  4(*!9 .:4:+ ;

#

*!% *4 *):*

<%< % *4 +<

0 1 2 ' 6 5 
   $

'* )* ; 4*
1 %( *2

 *!*9 '+<:

1'%( *2 


%
$ $
   

4


  

 

5

 B21
6  <

  C  0 8        

 

    

;

  

 
 *     

  D D    

      



 D  

D  D   D     D

D
   

          

  

   

 

  

   )

 

 

 





%!
!
Spousal consortium 

   

         

    



      

  

    /  D
%!
%
Parental consortium     



  

D  

   

     

   

     D
%!
#
Filial consortium     

  

 

  


6 

      

         


  

   



   

    

$  

          

 
22
 



 

     

       3  /     

 



  E  

  

   

      
 3   /                 

      

 

   
     

 

  

      


23
 3>  

6  

    

     

  

  

  

* 

  

         

     



    
C 

   

     

    6 
6   



    
   

      

       

   

           

   

24
        

         

    

 

   D

 D   C  0 
*  







    

  7 &++++ 

 ,







 

 

FAO-5950-2012, titled as "Sonia and others Vs. Amandeep Mittal and others"
 
# 

2 
!

3


#
 %
#
 
 
 





;
 %
 

  






  $
 
 
  




 
 $
 
# 

   
$ 

!(

;
 %


# 







 $
# 
 

!!

"
 




4 &7(((25
 
#

5 ;




















# 



!&

 $
 


.1




  

# $# 

1'

',2 




D
:

$2 5:

$


E2
D
 #


E