Tarsem Singh v. State Of Punjab And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-46715-2021 Date of Decision: 05.04.2022 Tarsem Singh ......... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ......... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- Mr. Ranjeet K. Jaswal, Advocate for Ms. Amarjit Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harsimar Singh Sitta, AAG, Punjab.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel has referred to Annexure R-2/T, i.e. the statement of the petitioner, which is a part of the reply stating therein that there is no threat perception.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition has been rendered infructuous.

Given above, the present petition is disposed of having been infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court and file a fresh petition in case any threat perception arises in future. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 05.04.2022 Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2022.04.06 10:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document