Neeraj Gupta v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M No.43904 of 2021 ...1...

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.43904 of 2021 Date of Decision: 27th January, 2022.

Neeraj Gupta

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

(Heard through Video-Conferencing) CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. L.M.Gulati, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Ambika Sood, Addl.AG, Haryana.

* * * * MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.

(ORAL) The petitioner herein has sought the relief of anticipatory bail in the criminal case arising out of the FIR bearing No.380 dated 13.09.2021 registered at Police Station Baldev Nagar, District Ambala, under Sections 323, 34, 427, 452 & 506 IPC.

Status-report filed on behalf of the respondent-State, by way of the affidavit of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ambala Cantt., is already available on the file and the same is taken on the record. Learned State counsel, on the instructions from HC Pradeep Kumar from the above-said Police Station, apprises the Court that in compliance of the order dated 25.10.2021 as passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined in the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required and he is also not involved in any other criminal case of the SEEMA SHARMA 2022.01.27 16:15 I attest to the accuracy of this order

CRM-M No.43904 of 2021 ...2...

similar nature.

In view of the afore-said submission as made by learned State counsel, the instant petition is allowed and the relief of interim bail, as extended to the petitioner by this Court vide the said order dated 25.10.2021, is made absolute.

However, the petitioner shall continue to join in the investigation as and when required/called upon to do so and shall also strictly abide by all the conditions as laid down in Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE 27.01.2022.

seema Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes Whether Reportable?

No SEEMA SHARMA 2022.01.27 16:15 I attest to the accuracy of this order