← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaFAO/6091/2012allowed

Sheela Devi v. Naresh Sharma And ANR

2026-03-19Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma14 pages



  

    

   

 !

"# $ %&&# ''''''(( !&) "*'

!+*

!+,!

!&- !&+'

''''''*(.&-&)* *+"- .&/ '0'   +.&.%&1- .&/ '0'   ( .!-- .&/ 2'0'   /  34  '







  



     

       

  ! 

""""





'

#

$   % &  '

  (# ()

(#  %    !$% *  +,$% -. ! #)) /#011 !! &   !

2 )((((3  #4( / #011 &'506 !   !

   /  ()

(#(

!    8 !!  '

% $%        8% 9%

 





 4  

4 

 

:

$  !



  

! % $% '  %  $    % ' 

!! %    '

              

  ! '! &  '

 &% 

 !!   % $%  &%&  $ !  

;

      ' ' %  

4 45 





)

<-% !   Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Another 6 

%(+, .%+) !**  7 ' ' !!       !  

=30  

        

      

    

         

  

   

     

 

 

 

  

  

  

        



    !"#$      

  %#  !"&$       

  &'

0    !"($      

 

 31)

       

        *               (+,      

    





 



                  

  -

 

           

        

   

         $           .  /

 

     

     

            

  *  

 

              



         

      32 

     

            (+,           

            (+,    

                    



  

                                           

 

2

              * * * * * * 42.)     

    

       &$        

     0

 1    $        !2    !(%+ %!%(

$ 

    

 3!4 %'#+

3!'#!#(

3!(#'&+

3!&&!&(

 3!#&'(+

  

    

 3!!(!((

35(''+

34 '!'(

 3(''4+

<-%  !            National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. 6 8



 97   ' #))#):

 #)1 /#011 '& 

+.

>         &  ?   !! @ +A.

    !  &    &    @ + .

& %  &!@ +>.

2  %&   !  !  ? ' @

: +B.

C  &   &'!

 %@ !?  $  &! 

=52. 6  conventional heads



  

   

 7/

8 *   7 %(+++   

7

!+++++    

        7  !+++++  

  

    

   

      

 

 7/

  0   9 

 



          



             

  



   



  :    

  

    6                   

 

     



  

      

   

  

  

 

  

; 

  

     

  

  

   

       

    



        



                     

      

   





  * 

           

 

         

   

  

   

 

        

    7 !(+++ &++++ 7 !(+++

              

   <       

   

 )        

     

 

  



  

  

 !+,   

)   

  



  

 

 

  = = = = = 59.3)    

  (+,     





 



 /      &+

   

   #+,  



 

&+(+

* 

  

  (+'+

    !(,         

 59.4* 







 $       &+,

  

  

  

 &+

6  %(,

  

 &+(+

 !+,

8

  

 (+'+



 

  

    

   

     

  59.5.              

    

     #+#%0> ?

    

    59.6.



                0  > @        &%     /

 59.7  

         59.87   

        

  



 

     

    7  !(+++  7  &++++     7  !(+++

   

    

   !+,  

A <-%  !            !;,!

&+!

&*%+!&1 .,(!&< 4#,#)- =*'

!&% !, ! #!*  % +% !,  ) +* 6 99

 07

&  !+ !

=+,! *%(+!

 +!&!<

) # %(+!

  '& &!

2    !  

B216  <

  C  0 8        

 

    

;



   

9      *     

  D  D    

      



 D  

 D  D    D     D

 D    

          

  

   

 

  

   )

 

 

 



 

%!!Spousal consortium 

   

          

    



      

  

    /  D %!%Parental consortium     



  

D  

   

     

   

     D %!# Filial consortium     

  

 

  

6 

      

          

  

   



   

      

          

 

 22   



 

     

       3  /     

 



  E   

   

   



        3   /                 

      

 

           

 

   

      

  23 3>  

6  

    

     

  

  

  

* 

  

          

     

 

      C  

   

      

    6 6   

 

       

      

       

    

           

   

 24         

         

     

 

   D

  D   C  0 8*  







     

  7 &++++ 

 

 !& '

    !

 '

 %47  & !  '

   %'9&      '

 &2 ;(((3

! <' $%   '

!!!

 !   2  )((((3    #4(    / !

3  & '

!



  &    

#(

$ $%  !! %&  !

3     %&

!!! !  #4( / #011 & $%   &  '

  &! <,% ! Jitender Kumar v. Sanjay Prasad passed in Civil Appeal No. 7199 of 2025 (Arising Out of SLP(C)No. 27779 of 2023), decided on 22.05.2025,'  !

 &   !!  $ ! D ! ! ?%!

  & '     $?

8   %&!

% 

&  !  &  !      $     $      & *!

- + .  

 B!#*         

         <  0$      

    F D!&* 

      



 

  

   

        

        /

               

        



  

           

   

                 



   

            

## $  %? !%'%<-%

! Seema Rani and Ors. v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. and Ors., 2025 SCC Online SC 283.''

%    ! %!

  &!% '  

#

' &! % %    !

 & 8 !  !

     !'9    !

  &%  &  $  !

 &  &

&           ! %

#:

8 !

 & 9 !

 !

' 

  %!  $ 

  !

 &  $ !  % '



 

   

  '

  %  !

!  %  !!!'

&   8!    Rs. 4300/7 per month

#;

  '

   $%   ' & !!  ' &  '!#:%   '

#)

  '

   $%   &5 ;6!    &&  &  !%  % :>  '

#7

  '

  F $%          &      '

     ?

$#3:'

 ?  %   '

#1

  '

   !&   & C! !&   ?'  ! % '

 ! '

8 &  

0  4



#0

' ' '%<-% !   % &!   ' $ '

  (# ()

(#   !  &  $     !

    !    !



Sr. No.

Heads Compensation Awarded #  ! 2 4:((3

C5 ;6 2 #(7;3 + ;64:((.

:

> '

  ?#3: 2 #70#3 +;:7;G#3:.

$  ! 2 :;14+;:7;

#70#.

;

 #:

)  > 2 ;;0#(43 +:;14G# G#:.

FB  2 #;(((3

C B? 2 #;(((3

F !

 2 4(((?# 2 4((((3

#(

.)!

.,(&*!)#.& *'? ?2 @ ## -%1)#.&

!'

%$% *'?@ #

& !&1- !,.%&) *':??2@ ? ?2?

(

    %<-%

! Dara Singh @ Dhara Banjara Vs. Shyam Singh Varma   08  R.Valli and Others vs. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (2022) 5 Supreme Court Cases 107 ?

    !

  & 506 !  !!  & !  D 

#

$   !  

   !!  &''$% ' '!! &! $

2 $% %  !!  & '  !

3   $ !

3   % 9  $%

&  +.   







'0'    

 I 9&3  9& J3 I %  J