← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRWP/10162/2021allowed

Naveen Kumar v. State Of Haryana And Others

2021-10-28Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara2 pages

   



IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

CRWP-10162-2021 Date of Decision:-28.10.2021 Naveen Kumar.

......Petitioners.

Versus

State of Haryana & Ors.

......Respondents.

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Randeep Singh Dhull, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Rajat Gautam, DAG Haryana.

*** THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING ANOOP CHITKARA, J.(ORAL) FIR No.

Dated Police Station Sections 04.10.2010 Sahlawas, Jhajjar 392, 397, 302 and 120-B IPC and Sections 25/54/59 of Arms Act Criminal Case No. before trial Court Session Case RBT 81 of 2011/2013 Criminal Case No. before High Court CRA-S-4882-SB-2014  The petitioner who is undergoing his sentence in the case captioned above, has come up before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for grant of parole.

2.

Vide accompanied annexure, the convict had made a written request to the concerned Jail Superintendent for release on parole. However, the convict did not get any response.

3.

Feeling aggrieved, he has filed the instant writ petition on the grounds that marriage of the petitioner's son is fixed for 14th November, 2021. He is the only Mama of the bridegroom and as per Hindu customs he has important religious roles to perform. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has also placed on VINAY MAHAJAN 2021.10.29 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

    record the wedding card to corroborate his averment. 4.

Although the petitioner is not entitled to get parole under the parole rules, the aura of Article 21 of the Constitution of India would remove any such restrictions if the facts and circumstances justify such parole. A prisoner cannot be deprived of attending a significantly important family event because the family members and the immediate relatives, apart from friends and the neighbors, usually take care of the family members of a person under incarceration. The prisoner also longs for their cooperation, support, and even financial help. In return, such persons would also expect the prisoner to reciprocate by attending their sacrosanct family functions, fully aware that such presence is fraught with the risk of social boycott or dejection.

5.

Given above, the petition is allowed and the petitioner shall be release on parole for fourteen days, subject to furnishing requisite bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned authorities.

6.

The parole is subject to the condition that the petitioner shall surrender all weapons, firearms, ammunition, if any, along with the arms license to the concerned authority during the release period and shall not repeat or commit any offence; and the violation might not entitle the similar reliefs in future. Petition allowed.

( ANOOP CHITKARA ) JUDGE October 28, 2021 Vinay 

      

  

 VINAY MAHAJAN 2021.10.29 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document