Bachittar Singh Alias Lala v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

CRM-M No.44466 of 2021 Date of Decision:-29.10.2021 Bachittar Singh @ Lala.

....Petitioner.

Versus

State of Punjab.

....Respondernts.

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- Mr. Dilpreet Singh Gandhi, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms. Jasleen Kaur, AAG Punjab.

*** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.(ORAL) Learned State Counsel on instructions submits that charges have been framed.

After arguing for considerable time, learned Counsel for the petitioner draws attention to certain documents of report under Section 173 Cr.PC, which is are not available on record inadvertently because they were not supplied to him by his client in the proper manner.

Given above, learned Counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the present petition with the liberty to file fresh one by placing the entire record. It is requested that in case the fresh petition is filed, he shall be exempted from filing translated or typed copy of the challan. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. ( ANOOP CHITKARA ) JUDGE October 29, 2021 Vinay Whether speaking/reasoned :- Yes/No Whether reportable :- Yes/No VINAY MAHAJAN 2021.11.01 11:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document