Parkash Ram v. State Of Punjab And ORS


  




 !" "#$%$&'

(   )* %+ , "!$!$&") -")%.% /! !" .&0 1 &2!+")% "%3&2"&!%
 

 

     

 

  



     



  

!!!

 



   !

"      #



  $



 % &  '

%'(    )

) 

 $



%

  )

*   

$    ) 

 $

$  

+, ,- .,
/

 #      



*    )  

  

%

$
0,12.134 #

   )   

) 

*      )   $ # 



)   

5)36 .,
2  

 )  #

 

 

.

 $   

  

)

+77./34

*      ) 

%



)   #    

%

  $ # 8  

)  #   8 

   ))

#  $



   $   

)  



         

  $  $  # 



 

" )

%    )

 )   $ ) 

 

 )  ) 

 



  #

 )    ) 

9  

:$

+71/734

  .,
2 

    #$

  

%

)

  .,
/

" $  



+71/734 

 



  ;   



 ".  

#$ %& '()*)+!


 
, !

+--4   

)  # 

#    

#

 



"    $  /
+"", 5%# %" %.3) 

 "In my opinion, even if the assertion made in the written

+ statement is presumed to be correct it would not disentitle the petitioner for claiming interest. The jurisprudential basis for grant of interest is the fact that one person's money has been used by somebody else. It is in that sense rent for the usage of money. If the user is compounded by any negligence on the part of the person with whom the money is lying it may result in higher rate because then it can also include the component of damages (in the form of interest). In the circumstances, even if there is no negligence on the part of the State it cannot be denied that money which rightly belonged to the petitioner was in the custody of the State and was being used by it." <$ #

   

+71/734 )  



 = > 



* ) 

   

#

 # )  

 



  #

  )  

 

#

 )

6 7

4 

/6// kanchan

 √ Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No √ Whether reportable : Yes/No