Arun v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-40513-2022 Date of Decision:-15.02.2023 ARUN ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA ... Respondent(s) -.-

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARAMJIT SINGH -.- Present:- Mr. Sunil Kumar Dhanda, Advocate for Mr. Naveen Jaglan, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Naveen Kumar Sheoran, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Amit Khari, Advocate for the complainant.

-.- KARAMJIT SINGH , J. (Oral) Prayer is for grant of anticipatory bail in case having FIR No.610 dated 31.7.2022 registered under Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 307, 506, 120-B, 216 IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act (Section 326 IPC added later on) at Police Station Old Industrial, District Panipat. GAURAV SOROT 2023.02.17 10:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order, judgment and documents.

( 2 ) CRM-M-40513-2022 The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has joined investigation with the police and that now matter has been compromised between the parties.

State counsel on instructions from SI Inder Singh submits that the petitioner who has joined investigation is not required by police for further investigation or for custodial interrogation. The counsel appearing for the complainant has objection if the petition is allowed as the matter has been compromised between the parties. In view of the above, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is hereby allowed and order dated 14.11.2022 is hereby made absolute. The petitioner should abide by the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

( KARAMJIT SINGH) 15.02.2023 JUDGE Gaurav Sorot Whether reasoned / speaking?

Yes / No Whether reportable?

Yes / No GAURAV SOROT 2023.02.17 10:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order, judgment and documents.