Harbans Singh & ORS v. State Of Punjab & ORS

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-7001-2016 Date of Decision: August 17, 2017 Harbans Singh and others .....Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL 1.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

Yes/No 2.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No.

3.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No .......

Present:

Ms.Harveen Kaur, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr.Rajesh Bhardwaj, Sr.DAG, Punjab.

Mr.J.S.Bhandohal, Advocate for respondent No.7-Gram Panchayat.

Mr.H.S.Sandhu, Advocate for respondent No.8.

........

SURYA KANT, J.

It is stated by Mr.J.S.Bhandohal, learned counsel for the Gram Panchayat, that the State Government through Financial Commissioner has passed the order dated 04.05.2017 whereby the lease agreement in favour of respondent No.8 has been cancelled.

In this view of the matter, the writ petition has become infructuous. The Gram Panchayat is directed to take back the possession of the land and utilise it for common purposes of the village in accordance with the Rules.

( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE August 17, 2017 ( SUDHIR MITTAL ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No Meenu 2017.08.18 15:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh