Maa Vidhya Devi Shoksha & Krida Samiti v. State Of Haryana And ORS

PANKAJ KUMAR 2015.01.19 14:20

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.789 of 2015 Date of Decision.16.01.2015 Maa Vidhya Devi Shiksha and Krida Samiti .......Petitioner

Versus

The State of Haryana and others ......Respondents

Present:

Mr. Pankaj Maini, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will be satisfied if the representation given by the petitioner under Annexure P4 is considered by respondent No.2 and an appropriate decision is taken within a stipulated time. The 2nd respondent is directed to consider the representation given by the petitioner under Annexure P-4 to take a decision and inform the same to the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 2.

I dispense with notice to the respondents, for, I am not passing any order on merits of the case. The writ petition is disposed of with the above directions.

(K. KANNAN) JUDGE January 16, 2015 Pankaj*