Mubarik v. State Of Haryana And Another

CRA-S-2647-2024 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA-S-2647-2024 Date of Decision: 09.08.2024 Mubarik .... Appellant

Versus

State of Haryana and another .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - Mr. Balraj Gujjar, Advocate for the appellant. Ms. Deepshikha Chauhan, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Munfaid Khan, Advocate for the complainant. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Vakalatnama filed on behalf of the complainant is taken on record.

The appellant has preferred the present appeal against the order dated 12.07.2024 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Special Court for trial of offence under POCSO Act, Nuh, dismissing the application filed by the appellant for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 231 dated 20.11.2022 registered under Sections 363, 366A, 376, 384, 120B, 506 and 201 read with Section 34 IPC; Sections 17 and 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012; and Section 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 at Police Station Rojka Meo. Learned counsel for the State has filed custody certificate RISHU KATARIA 2024.08.09 17:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

CRA-S-2647-2024 -2dated 08.08.2024 of the appellant which is taken on record, as per which the appellant has been in custody as an undertrial for a period of 01 year, 06 months and 15 days.

After arguing for some time, when this Court is not inclined to accord the benefit of regular bail to the appellant, learned counsel submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition, at this stage.

Permitted to do so.

Dismissed as withdrawn, at this stage.

09.08.2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2024.08.09 17:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.