Union Of India v. Santokh Singh Deceased Represented By His Lrs And ORS.

 



 
!"

!#
"

$%&
% '
% (% %
%

% %  )

 '*
  )+) 





  

  




 



)

  





 


 



)

  





 

  




 



)



 





 

  




 



)



 








 



)

 





 
  

 


 



,)

   







 

  




 



+)

   





 

  




 



)

   





!  
" #

 



   





#$ 


 



)

   





 


 



)

   





 % 

  




 



)

   






 %
  




 



)

+  





& #
 %
  




 



!

%- !

.&/
- )
$"0


% 10
-% "$%

(
)#
* +
 
*
&#

, 
(
, 
) +
)

+ 



-.

(
)  
)% +
)*+
# $

(
  
*# +
)

+


! /




&-0121-020/ 

! /
&-0122+
0123+
4//3+
4/05

020/+ 

! /


+
0


+
6
4

&-4/55-020/ 

! /

1

&-4/54-020/


 
! /

7

&-4008-020/

99999 % 10
-% "$%
$)
!2 /

This judgment shall dispose of, aforementioned 14 revision petitions wherein similar facts and controversy are involved. For reference, facts are taken from CR-2509-2021.

2.

By way of present revision petition, challenge has been laid to an order dated 25.03.2021 passed by the Executing Court-cum-Additional District Judge, Patiala, whereby, the objections filed by the petitionerjudgment debtor were declined. 3.

The primary dispute relates to award of interest on the solatium as well as additional amount of compensation to the respondents-landowners in terms of decision dated 25.02.2005 passed by the LPA Bench of this Court whereby market value for the acquired land was assessed at the rate of Rs.4,48,159/- per acre, besides other statutory benefits and the same was later affirmed by the Hon'ble Apex Court, vide decision dated 09.09.2014, passed in Civil Appeal No.7314-7365 of 2015.

4.

Learned counsels for the respondents submit that the matter

pertaining to the same acquisition proceedings with similar dispute already stands adjudicated upon by this Court vide CR-1580 of 2022 (O&M) and other connected matters, decided on 28.07.2023, whereby the revision petition filed by petitioner-judgment debtor was dismissed and thus, the present case can be disposed of in the same terms, to which, learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to controvert the same. 5.

Accordingly, the above-mentioned civil revisions are dismissed in terms of order dated 28.07.2023, passed in CR-1580-2022, titled as "Union of India vs. Dharam Paul @ Dharam Pal and others", thereby, upholding the order passed by the Executing Court as regard payment of interest on solatium as well as additional amount of compensation awarded in favour of the respondents-landowners for the reason that the final determination of compensation in favour of respondents-landowners by the Higher Courts was much after the decision by the Hon'ble Apex Court in case of "Sunder vs. Union of India", AIR 2001 SC 3516. 4/



% 10
-% "$% 
$"'

:


 ;  '

< ;! :


  $

< ;
!