Anirudh Kaushal And ANR v. State Bank Of Patiala Thr Its Manager And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 2827 of 2017 Decided on : 27.02.2017 Anirudh Kaushal and another . . . Petitioners

Versus

State Bank of Patiala and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: Mr. Sanjay Kaushal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ishan Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners.

**** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) The petitioners have approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking quashing of the notice dated 18th January, 2017 (Annexure P-20), issued by respondent No.2, besides, making other prayers made in the writ petition. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that as on date, the petitioners have paid the entire amount of loan as claimed in Annexure P-20. It was, thus, prayed that liberty be granted to the petitioners to withdraw the present writ petition, at this stage, by permitting them to file a detailed and comprehensive representation before the Bank, pointing out, all the factual matrix intimating therein that the entire loan amount has been discharged and amount in excess has been paid. 3.

Dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to the petitioners to take recourse to the remedies as may be available to them, in accordance with law.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (RAMENDRA JAIN) February 27, 2017 JUDGE J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Jawala Ram 2017.03.01 16:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh