Sunil v. Ranbir Singh
'()*+,-).)(/ 0 1 1 #23#3,!.4.4).)( 5 #66,# "# $ $
#$7,3#6 !
%& - '* &,
%
....
% /' ' order dated 17.05.2024 (Annexure P -6) whereby the application (An nnexure P-5) under 9 Rule 4 read d with Section n 151, 152, 153 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short as s 'CPC') for r restoration of application under Order 9 Rule 7 CPC has been n dismissed in n
! 0 12 2 +
) 3 !' 4
! " # $% &'
('
% ) *' )
+'
+ '
! !'
', )) '
! 5
+ , '
6)
+
) %*'+ 7 ) ,
8+ ') %*'+') !'
!"
" # $%&'
('
% ) /')
))
8 ' ) ! ' 9 * %
))
+
' %' * )
1 : :"
; $ 1 5
+ , '
' + !
! ')
) ) '
' ''
)
%') + ))
' /'
% ' , <
2 "
;
$
!
1 : :
!
',=
* ,
'
> "
; 1$ 5
+ +
'
++ )
* ( '?
+ %&'
('
%) + +
' % + ' ;
+
'
! #
+ % ' ) ' ;
'
! 2
> < !
! ' ( * ! , '
% ') ,
: "
;
>$ 9 Rule 4 read with Section 151, 152, 153 CPC for restoration of f the applicati on. Learned counsel further ar rgues that the application dated d 10.08.2022 ( (Annexure P-5) remained pendin ng before the learned trial Court t for about two o years and the same was dismis sed vide order dated 17.05.2024 (Annexure P -6).
> = ,)!
'
'
'
' ) ''
)
,) !'+ =
'
')
* * ' ;) ' 5
+ ,'
'! )) )
'+ !', )
,
' % +
) *' ' ! 2 ='
'
+
'
! '
!'') ) ( : = '
) +
''
, 8+ =
,% )
'
' ))
)
+) !') +
8+ ) ' !'
' '
+ ' ) + !! '
'
!!+
' )
' ) ) +! ' !
*' !+% % + !! '
'
')
, =* '
'
' '
)
))
+'% !' ' )
'
8 + ', '+ %
'*
!
! ' ,
! +'+ @ ,
%'+ '
' ) ,'
)) ! ') )
'
' '
!,
! ' !
', = ' + +, +% + ,) 8+ * '
% = '
+ )) ' !
' )
!, ' ))
! !
', ++
!%,)!
17.05.2024 (A Annexure P-6) %8 + ) , >%
6 + ) ') ")
$
))
'
'
'
! ;
' ) '
!, '
!
) !+
',
+ ?!
+ %;)+ )
'
( (
8 , '
'
'
! ;
'
% '
!
! '
) *
++
! = ,
+
+
% '
'
, + 1 ) * *' '
% , ,
+ ! '
*'1
! % % ) ++
! / 1 .4.4).)( ,) A'' ) (!6
A'' ) B60 B60