Shashi v. Uco Bank

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 7239 of 2016 Decided on : 01.02.2017 Shashi . . . Petitioner

Versus

UCO Bank . . . Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: Mr. Aalok Jagga, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. KPS Dhillon, Advocate for the respondent-Bank.

**** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) The petitioner has approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ in the nature of Certiorari, for setting aside the sale notice dated 19th March, 2016 and notice dated 22nd March, 2016 (Annexure P-10), issued by the Bank, under Rule 8(6) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002. 2.

After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to pursue remedy before the D.R.T., in accordance with law.

3.

Dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to the petitioner to take recourse to the remedies as may be available to her, in accordance with law.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (RAMENDRA JAIN) February 01, 2017 JUDGE J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Jawala Ram 2017.02.03 13:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh