Ramesh Kumar v. Hssc And ANR

CWP-7246-2016 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-7246-2016 Date of decision: - 15.10.2019 Ramesh Kumar

...Petitioner

Versus

Haryana Staff Selection Commission and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present:- Mr. Himanshu Chhabra, Advocate for Mr. Jaideep Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Charanjit Singh Bakhshi, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Pankaj Kundra, Advocate for Mr. Deepak Sabherwal, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

**** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) Counsel for respondent No.2 argues that petitioner is challenging his non-selection to the post of Assistant Lineman in respect of the advertisement No.1/2011 and no person, who is likely to be affected in case the plea of the petitioner is allowed, is party to the present writ petition.

Counsel for respondent No.2 further argues that all the posts have already been filled up and therefore, in the absence of the selected candidates as party, no relief can be granted to the petitioner. NARESH KUMAR 2019.10.25 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP-7246-2016 -2Faced with this situation, counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action by impleading all the concerned, who are likely to be affected in case the plea of the petitioner challenging the selection is allowed.

Dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty, as prayed for. ( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) October 15, 2019 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking?

Yes Whether reportable?

No NARESH KUMAR 2019.10.25 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh