Subhash v. Inder Jeet And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.132 FAO-6631-2012 Date of Decision: 21.02.2025 SUBHASH ....Appellant

Versus

INDER JEET AND ORS .....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Mr. J.P.Sharma, Advocate for the appellant.

None for respondents No.1 to 3.

Mr. Sachin Ohri and Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advocates for respondent No.4.

Mr. Nigam K Bhardwaj and Ms. Khushboo Garg, Advocates for respondent No.6.

***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral) At this stage, counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has since died and there is no legal representative of the deceased. As such, he expressed his inability for further prosecution of the appeal. In the given circumstances and in view of the submission made aforesaid, the present appeal is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution, with the clause of revival, if anyone makes appearance on behalf of any of the legal representative of the appellant.

(ARCHANA PURI) 21.02.2025 JUDGE
 Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No Sonu 2025.02.21 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P&HHC