Parveen Kumar v. Haryana Staff Selection Commission And Another
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P No. 26719 of 2018 Date of decision : 16.10.2018 Parveen Kumar ....Petitioner versus Hry. Staff Selection Commission and anr ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present:
Ms. Veenus Dhaka, Advocate for the petitioner.
**** RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral) Pursuant to advertisement No.4/2018, the petitioner applied for the Group D post under General Category, as per application form dated 15.09.2018 (Annexure P-1). Now the precise grievance of the petitioner before this Court that he has moved a representation dated 01.10.2018 (Annexure P-3) to consider him under DESM category, as he has inadvertently applied under general category instead of DESM category. The petitioner has been issued DESM certificate on 13.04.2018 by Zila Sainik Board, Panipat (Annexure P-2).
Without commenting on the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioner under DESM category for Group D post, after verifying his DESM certificate (Annexure P-2) (RITU BAHRI) JUDGE 16.10.2018 G Arora Gaurav Arora 2018.10.16 17:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh