← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/7313/2016dismissed

Vinay Kumar v. State Of Haryana & ORS

2022-05-12Mr. Justice Arun Monga2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-7313-2016 (O&M) Date of decision: May 12, 2022 Vinay Kumar ....Petitioner versus State of Haryana and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

Present:

Mr. Ajay Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, DAG Haryana.

***** ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL) Petition herein, inter alia, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to re-evaluate the answer sheet of paper of General Forestry and further to direct the respondents to award marks for those questions which were not checked by the examiner. Further prayer has been made directing respondents to afford the petitioner an opportunity of personal hearing.

2.

On 04.05.2022, this Court had passed the following order: "Case has been taken up after a long gap caused by the intervening pandemic period.

Prima facie case of the petitioner seems to have been rendered infructuous in view of the revaluation already carried out, as is borne out from Annexure R-1 appended with the written statement whereby by virtue of re-evaluation of the result, his marks have further been reduced from 40.5 to 39.75.

Confronted with the situation, learned proxy counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks accommodation on the ground that arguing counsel is indisposed.

At his request, adjourned to 12.05.2022."

3.

On resumed hearing, apropos observations made in order dated 04.05.2022, no further explanation is coming forth. In any case, it is not for this Court to again re-evaluate the answer-sheets or sit in Judgement over the export domain of the examiners. The grievance of the petitioner that his answer sheet MAHAVIR SINGH 2022.05.13 09:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this Judicial Record/ Decree/ Document, which is scanned copy of the original\

be re-evaluated, stands mitigated and pursuant thereto, his marks were reduced further. On that short ground alone, no grounds for interference are made out. 4.

Dismissed.

(ARUN MONGA) JUDGE May 12, 2022 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2022.05.13 09:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this Judicial Record/ Decree/ Document, which is scanned copy of the original\