← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/22447/2019dismissed

M/S Hari Om Ispat Udyog v. State Of Punjab And ORS

2019-10-03Mr Justice Jaswant Singh,Mr. Justice Lalit Batra2 pages

CWP 22447/2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP 22447/2019 Date of decision:03.10.2019.

M/s Hari Om Ispat Udyog ..............Petitioner v.

State of Punjab and others ..............Respondents Coram:

Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh Hon'ble Mr.Justice Lalit Batra Present:- Mr.Umang Goyal,Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Pankaj Gupta,Addl.AG Punjab for respondents. Jaswant Singh,J.

Petitioner, a partnership firm,has filed this writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution inter alia seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 26.3.2019(P-3) whereby respondent no.3 i.e. Proper Officer-cum-State Tax Officer,Ward No.2,Ludhiana had cancelled its registration under the PGST,Act 2017 on the ground of issuance of bills without supply of goods and/or services.

Vide order dated 26.8.2019, reproduced below, notice of motion was issued:- "The challenge is to the order dated 26.3.2019 (Annexure P-3), whereby the Registration Certificate under the Punjab Goods and Services Tax Act,2017 has been cancelled. The petitioner-partnership firm is stated to have filed an appeal dated 29.4.2019 (Annexure P-5) against RAJINDER PARSHAD JOSHI 2019.10.04 11:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP 22447/2019 impugned order dated 26.3.2019 (Annexure P-3) and also an application dated 29.3.2019 (Annexure P-4) for revocation of cancellation.

The grievance is that neither the appeal is being decided nor application for revocation of cancellation. Notice of motion for 11.9.2019.

Mr.Pankaj Gupta, Addl.AG Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent. He seeks time to have instructions. Requisite number of paper books be furnished to learned State counsel during course of day. To be shown in the urgent list."

At the time of hearing today,learned counsel for the petitioner states that the appeal against the impugned order P-3 stands dismissed by respondent no.4 vide order dated 25.9.2019 and as such the instant writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the appellate order dated 25.9.2019. Learned State counsel does not contest the request. A copy of order dated 25.9.2019 passed by appellate authority has been produced in Court and the same is taken on record.

In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to petitioner to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law, if so advised.

(Jaswant Singh) Judge 03.10.2019.

(Lalit Batra) joshi Judge Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAJINDER PARSHAD JOSHI 2019.10.04 11:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document