Rajinder Kumar Gupta v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Civil Writ Petition No.827 of 2015 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 17.03.2016 Rajinder Kumar Gupta .....Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI Present: Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, DAG, Haryana Ms. Supriya Garg, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3 ..

S.J. VAZIFDAR, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral):

The petition is devoid of material particulars. The allotment is in favour of another party and not the petitioner. The petitioner claims to have purchased the property from the original allottee. The petitioner also claims that the respondents have transferred the property to his name. Evidence in respect thereof is not annexed to the petition. Even the demand notice has not been annexed to the petition.

2.

In view of the above, the petitioner does not have locus standi to demand an occupation certificate. The petition is, therefore, dismissed with liberty to file a fresh petition after furnishing full particulars.

(S.J. VAZIFDAR) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE 17.03.2016 ( ARUN PALLI ) parkash* JUDGE PARKASH CHAND 2016.03.18 15:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document