High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRWP/9995/2020disposed of

Muskan And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others

2020-12-02Mrs. Justice Meenakshi I. Mehta2 pages

CRWP No. 9995 of 2020 ...1..

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.103 CRWP No. 9995 of 2020 Date of Decision: 02nd December, 2020.

Muskan & Anr.

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana & Ors.

...Respondents

(Heard through Video-Conferencing) CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. Varinder Basa, Advocate, for Mr. Yaseen Sethi, Advocate, for the petitioners.

* * * * * * * MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA (ORAL) By way of the instant petition, the petitioners have sought the indulgence of this Court for issuance of direction to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect their life and personal liberty as they apprehend threat to the same at the hands of respondents No.4 and 5 because they (petitioners) have solemnized their marriage against the wishes of these respondents. A further prayer has also been made for issuance of direction to respondents No.2 and 3 not to allow respondents No.4 and 5 to interfere in their personal life or harass them in any manner. It has also been mentioned in the petition that the petitioners have already moved a representation (Annexure P-4) to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Panchkula, on 27.11.2020, in this regard.

Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3 only. SEEMA SHARMA 2020.12.02 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRWP No. 9995 of 2020 ...2..

Mr. Parveen Aggarwal, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, at the asking of the Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. Heard.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners restricts his prayer to issuance of a direction to respondent No.2 to take appropriate action on the said representation (Annexure P-4).

Learned counsel for the State has no objection for the same. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the legality and validity of the marriage, as stated to have been solemnized between the petitioners, respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Panchkula, is hereby directed to look into the said representation (Annexure P-4) and if it is found that the petitioners genuinely deserve any protection, then to take appropriate action in accordance with law.

This petition stands disposed of.

(MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE 02.12.2020.

seema Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes/No Whether Reportable?

Yes/No SEEMA SHARMA 2020.12.02 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document