Ram Kishan v. State Of Punjab And Others

 





 

  










   

   !



"

#



 





























$  %&




'%()*+,

-.!/0,
&-,!'
*'& 1&- 





 




 

 
 








 !

&-,!'
*'& 1&-2
-
"

#

 



$  %

&'
( )* 
+, +) -+".
%


)+, 

'/




%

  
0

 
$ 
%
% 1

 
!

 
1 1

+2 "- -+"3
45 
 -6

-

#
 


 


 
&'
0 %

 
1

71
7  1 8 
( -

' 0
%
 

-3 ""

-+"2

! 
2"9
1

1 
1#

0
7 
0
 


1
1
 
/

% 1
0 
 
0
 %

1

! 
1#
1
1   
0 
0
%



1  0
7   

0
 
 
 
  
 
0
 


#
; 
7

 %
1
 
5 
$ 
0 1


%

%
 
  
<
%

 
&'
 %
11
 
 %
0
1

 

11

=1#
 

/ 




+3 "- -+"3



 -+++8


)+, 
'/

0


+2
1 
% 
1

1
0


 "+++8


-.3
'/

!
 0
 
 #

%%
%
 




 
 / 
 







!
 
/ 

  

%
  %
#

 



!
 



/ 
 







1 1
 +2 "- -+"3
45 
 -6

 
!

0 

 !


$  %

 
&'
0

$ 
%
% 1 )

>
 

 

 1#
 

!
 

 

&'
%

 




 




 
1






 
 



 

1
%%

;0
! 


1!#

 

 
0 

 
 !

;
 
 !1
 

! 





 
1 1
 
  
%
0 
!
 % 
! 

! 



0

:
 !

% 1
 


%

 %1

 
/ 


 






 
    

 /

"29)"

-+"2 4.

Per contra, learned State counsel has opposed the present petition and submitted that the offence under Section 304-A is not an offence in private. It is submitted that the offence committed is grave and serious and the same do not fall within the ambit of compounding. ;
 !1
  

0




)+,
'/


   



0

!#
;?!

1
/ 

3 
!4


 













!



"

#



 2

65 7
!
 2

#

!


 3 "




 2

&0
6! $ 


7


!#
  

 
/ 

Baldev Singh vs. State of Punjab & anr., 2016(3) Law Herald 2020,



)+,
'/

!
1  

;
 

!%


#
1


!
 1


%

 

 

 %
 !




 
&'

$ 
0
%

 !

1

1 
71
7 
0 
1 
1#

0
7 
0 
 %
1
 

0

!#

! 
1# !%

!#
 


#
%
 



1
  

0
 

 
 



 
1
#

6.

The issue involved in the present case is that, can this Court under its power of inherent jurisdiction as enumerated under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 (erstwhile Section 482 Cr.P.C.) quash the proceedings under Section 304-A IPC on the basis of compromise arrived at between the accused and the complainant? @#
 
1 

 
 

)+,
'/


!



 

'
 




 
1 

 


 

;
 
1 1 
!


!#
 

!0
 
 


 
 
 


#
1 



 
%
1 # 
1 


%#%
 


 #


 
)-+
/  / 
 



0

1  !
0 1

0  
 1

 
/ 
;0
 
 

0

 
/ 
1 0


$  %


 

 




 1  !

 

;0

0

 
0

 
/ 


!
 1 
0 
5

;?!

1
/ 

3 
!4 9

4 6


0
% 
 0

!
5
!#
 
;%
/ 
5  # 
 (


!4

!



"

#2
5
6:7
!
::
;?!

1 / 



 ")"

'
0

 

 
0
 1


# 0
 
0%
 
!#
0 
;%
/ 
0  !
% 

%%
$ 
1

 
1
! 0
 

5%

0


,*-
 
/
0 
 %
 
1

$  %
  %

 %

 
 
1
0

  
0 
1
% (I) Power conferred under Section 482 of the Code is to be distinguished from the power which lies in the Court to compound the offences under Section 320 of the Code. No doubt, under Section 482 of the Code, the High Court has inherent power to quash the criminal proceedings even in those cases which are not compoundable, where the parties have settled the matter between themselves. However, this power is to be exercised sparingly and with caution.

(II) When the parties have reached the settlement and on that basis petition for quashing the criminal proceedings is filed, the guiding factor in such cases would be to secure: (i) ends of justice, or (ii) to prevent abuse of the process of any Court.

While exercising the power the High Court is to form an opinion on either of the aforesaid two objectives. (III) Such a power is not be exercised in those prosecutions which involve heinous and serious offences of mental depravity or offences like murder, rape, dacoity, etc. Such offences are not private in nature and have a serious impact on society. Similarly, for offences alleged to have been committed under special statute like the Prevention of Corruption Act the offences committed by Public Servants while working in that capacity are not to be quashed merely on the basis of compromise between the victim and the offender.

(IV) On the other, those criminal cases having overwhelmingly and pre-dominantly civil character, particularly those arising out of commercial transactions or arising out of matrimonial relationship or family disputes should be quashed when the parties have resolved their entire disputes among themselves.

(VI) Offences under Section 307 IPC would fall in the category of heinous and serious offences and therefore is to be generally treated as crime against the society and not against the individual alone. However, the High Court would not rest its decision merely because there is a mention of Section 307 IPC in the FIR or the charge is framed under this provision. It would be open to the High Court to examine as to whether incorporation of Section 307 IPC is there for the sake of it or the prosecution has collected sufficient evidence, which if proved, would lead to proving the charge under Section 307 IPC. For this purpose, it would be open to the High Court to go by the nature of injury sustained, whether such injury is inflicted on the vital/delegate parts of the body, nature of weapons used etc.

Medical report in respect of injuries suffered by the victim can generally be the guiding factor. On the basis of this prima facie analysis, the High Court can examine as to whether there is a strong possibility of conviction or the chances of conviction are remote and bleak. In the former case it can refuse to accept the settlement and quash the criminal proceedings whereas in the later case it would be permissible for the High Court to accept the plea compounding the offence based on complete settlement between the parties. At this stage, the Court can also be swayed by the fact that the settlement between the parties is going to result in harmony between them which may improve their future relationship. (VII) While deciding whether to exercise its power under Section 482 of the Code or not, timings of settlement play a crucial role.

Those cases where the settlement is arrived at immediately after the alleged commission of offence and the matter is still under investigation, the High Court may be liberal in accepting the settlement to quash the criminal proceedings/investigation. It is because of the reason that at this stage the investigation is still on and even the charge sheet has not been filed. Likewise, those cases where the charge is framed but the evidence is yet to start or the evidence is still at infancy stage, the High Court can show benevolence in exercising its powers favourably, but after prima facie assessment of the circumstances/material mentioned above.

7.

With regard to quashing the FIR for the offence under Section 306 IPC on the basis of compromise, Hon'ble Supreme Court in Daxaben's case (supra) has held as under:- "25. The only question in this appeal is whether the Criminal Miscellaneous Applications filed by the accused under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. could have been allowed and an FIR under Section 306 of the IPC for abetment to commit suicide, entailing punishment of imprisonment of ten years, could have been quashed on the basis of a settlement between the complainant and the accused named in the FIR. The answer to the aforesaid question cannot, but be in the negative.

xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx 37.

Offence under Section 306 of the IPC of abetment to commit suicide is a grave, non-compoundable offence. Of course, the inherent power of the High Court under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. is wide and can even be exercised to quash criminal proceedings relating to non-compoundable offences, to secure the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of Court. Where the victim and offender have compromised disputes essentially civil and personal in nature, the High Court can exercise its power under Section 482 of the CrPC to quash the criminal proceedings. In what cases power to quash an FIR or a criminal complaint or criminal proceedings upon compromise can be exercised, would depend on the facts and circumstances of the case. 38.

However, before exercising its power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to quash an FIR, criminal complaint and/or criminal proceedings, the High Court, as observed above, has to be circumspect and have due regard to the nature and gravity of the offence. Heinous or serious crimes, which are not private in nature and have a serious impact on society cannot be quashed on the basis of a compromise between the offender and the complainant and/or the victim. Crimes like murder, rape, burglary,

39.

Orders quashing FIRs and/or complaints relating to grave and serious offences only on basis of an agreement with the complainant, would set a dangerous precedent, where complaints would be lodged for oblique reasons, with a view to extract money from the accused. Furthermore, financially strong offenders would go scot free, even in cases of grave and serious offences such as murder, rape, bride- burning, etc. by buying off informants/complainants and settling with them. This would render otiose provisions such as Section 306, 498- A, 304-B etc. incorporated in the IPC as a deterrent, with a specific social purpose. 40.

In Criminal Jurisprudence, the position of the complainant is only that of the informant. Once an FIR and/or criminal complaint is lodged and a criminal case is started by the State, it becomes a matter between the State and the accused. The State has a duty to ensure that law and order is maintained in society. It is for the state to prosecute offenders. In case of grave and serious non- compoundable offences which impact society, the informant and/or complainant only has the right of hearing, to the extent of ensuring that justice is done by conviction and punishment of the offender. An informant has no right in law to withdraw the complaint of a non- compoundable offence of a grave, serious and/or heinous nature, which impacts society.

xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx 50.

In our considered opinion, the Criminal Proceeding cannot be nipped in the bud by exercise of jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr. P.C. only because there is a settlement, in this case a monetary settlement, between the accused and the complainant and other relatives of the deceased to the exclusion of the hapless widow of the deceased. As held by the three-Judge Bench of this Court in Laxmi Narayan & Ors. (supra), Section 307 of the IPC falls in the category of heinous and serious offences and are to be treated as crime against society and not against the individual alone. On a parity of reasoning, offence under Section 306 of the IPC would fall in the same category.

An FIR under Section 306 of the IPC cannot even be quashed on the basis of any financial settlement with the informant, surviving spouse, parents, children, guardians, care-givers or anyone else.

8.

On reading the findings arrived by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, it is deciphered that quashing FIRs and/or complaints relating to grave and serious offences only on basis of an agreement with the complainant, would be violative of the law settled. It has been further observed that this would render otiose the provisions such as Sections 306, 498-A, 304B, 304A etc. incorporated in the IPC. Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed that FIR registered for commission of the heinous/serious offences cannot be quashed on the basis of any financial settlement with the informant, surviving spouse, parents, children, guardians, care-givers or anyone else. Hon'ble Supreme Court, thus, has totally ruled out the quashing of the FIR for the heinous offences on the basis of the compromise.

:


 


 


$  %
 
&'
% 


)+,

 
!

1 1

#
!
 
!#
 


 
/ 

* ;
!4 9
 
6 $

7 
#%

 
 %1

;?!


1
/ 
!#

%

 A555 "-

= !#
 



!0
 0

 / 

1  




)-+
/
 /

$  % 
1
%

5

0


,*-
/
 /

'
3 
!4 )
 
6 $

72
 
;B!

1
/ 

! 



 

 
 

   


   
   
    
 


 




  
 
   


 !
 

 "

 

 
  #

$ 
%


 & 


' 
 

 

  

 
 





 !   

  "

 
   

   


 #

$ "

 

 















       

   
    

  


  
     & 
 & 
  %
           

            6$


7
")

'
3 
!4 )
 
6 $

7
 
$ 
0
%%
$ 

%



 !


)+.
'/

 
!

 1
!0
 
'
0
!
 


 
)+.
'/
0 


 
%#

 

 
 

%#



1
%
#


%
  

;0
 
;%
/ 
0 



 1#
! 
 


1

)+.
'/

 
&'

 
 %
 1

 


'
0 
!
 

 
 

  
0  
 

 



 
 %

 
)+.
'/
'
0 
!
 

 
;%
/ 

1 

1 
# ",

'
(


!4 


 

!



"

#





-+",
4-6
 / 
4/16
,*-
0


0

1
 %





)+.
'/


!


(

     

 
   


  


 
 

 #

$    
%

 
        
  
   
 

 ) 

 *  

     


   


 
  
  

   

  #

$   
%

 



+,  $  
    
   
 


  
 
    
     
 !-'.$


                

      

  !

        



      

 

          

      #

 



!-'.$ 


  


 
     
"


 
 


 
   
/  "9

:





)+, 
'/


 
0  
1






 
%
 
 

1#



1 1
0 
 

 
!
0

 1
! 

#
 



 )+, 



 

0 #

'



0
1


#


0 
0




%
 



0

1%

 
#
 "2


%
0 
$ 

 


1




)+, 

 

1 


 


1
/ 

!



"

#

!

#
* < 
/1



(
9-+

-+"9
 

!

 

0
 
0  

 

 !
1 

 !

 1
%

 
%#

 
1


)+, 
    
!

 

 

1  


 
 1 !



0 
 

0
#


%% 0

'
0
!
 #
0
%
0
#   
 1


 
0


 


 

0
 1

%  
#1  #
0 


#%
 #1
 1 

 

0
 

1#

  0 
#
 
 


!

 
 
#1

:


  

!

1  

 
 
 

 

 
A #

1 


 #
 #D
'

  


 





 
 
 
#

 
E





!  0



 
! 
 
!5 
 

  
0 


 1

%
 

 
;B!

1
/ 

1 1
% 
!
 
0
1
  
 E
  
 
 
%
#


)+, 
'/
'

  #
!
 


!%#

 

 
 


 
1



 
#


0 


1

 
11 

0


  

 
1 ".

'

;#
!4

!



'

= 
-+++4-6
 / 
4/16 *"2


!
!#
 
;B!

1
/ 
 
01 




    
 
   
 

     
     
  
2     
  
 


  
   
 
     
  
       "

  
  
 

"

  

 

 

       



      

#    

   

   

   

   $%  

& 0 3 
 

 


 
  

 '
    
 "




  



 
 

 

          
!+ 2'.$   
  




+ . 
*2


  "

 
  


     


 


 45 !!!67$$, 0.

0 
 
 
  2
 
      


  

 


   #  





"*

'
 


 1

 


0 

!

5




 



)+,  


 
'
 
1 

#


 !

 1
C 





 
8
 

 
 
%%


 
 
 
$ 



 
 

 


% 
0%

! 1

!




 


%
 
 11#
%

0#
 
1#
 

1


%
0 1%#

1#


 

11 

1


 
1 "3

 
% 1

 1#

 

   

 
%

%
$ 
1 


%
  


$  




%

1#

1 1
%


#
0

0


1   


!
0

 
% 1
0
1 


 
:
 1
 

1


!
0

!
 
0#  

 


%%

1#
!

1



 !

!E

 
1

1  %8 1

 
!

B 
1#
1 B

#
 
 
1 

 %
! 

1 
1#

 
# 

E
  % 
$ 

1 




F 



#
 
  

!

$  
!%


1


 
1
C 
!%
 #
  
 
% 


 
#
0 
 
1B
1#
1#
! 
 #

1#
!
!% 


1 1
 

 
 



1





 

#

!
 
!#
 
  -+

:
#
 
/ 
  





 
 
 

 




% 
 
0

 



1  


#

 

 

  
0 


%%

! #
!#
 
  % 
 



 
1B
%
 
<


!
   #

!#


1
/ 
 

%

1 
 

)9.
4)6
/
 /



!
%


1%%
  1

 
 

1 

 


!

 !

 


$ 






!

 
 
0 
 
1


0 
%


 

!# %%
$ 
1 
 %
  
!
$  
: #
 
/ 
  





 

 
  
 




% 
 
0



 

1  


#

 

 


  0 


%%

! #
!#
 
  % 
 #
0  %
0#
0 
1
!#
%
 
1 

 1B
%
 
<


!
  #

!#

1
/ 
 

%

1 


)9.

4)6
/
 /



!
%


1%%
 1

  

1 

 


!

 ! 


$  





!

 


0 
 
1
 
0 
%


 

!#
%%
$ 
1  
 %
  
!
$   -"

>0

0

%#
 


%
 
 

)+.
0


 
 


!
 
!# 
 
 
 1


1

1 1
!0




!

% %



 
'
 


 )+, 
 
1

! #




 
1
:
1 
%
 

%


1 1


 
1
 




% 



!
1
: $  %


)+, 
#

 
!


 1

1 1


!0
 
 

 
%  


1!

1
%



  
' 

 
%
 

 


1 

 18 1



 

1
  % 
 %
 
 !#

 
  #







 
1  --

;0




1
 0

 
;%
/  

,*-
/
 /

 
!
5



  1
0 



 

1




1
 

 
0 

 

0 


!

 
 
0



 %
 


 



 ! 



0
;0
 
!


11

 
!
 

%
 !#



!%
!
 

)+, 
'/


 
0

 
%

 

! 
$  %



%


)+, 

 ! $ 
%
#

 
!


1 1


! 0
 
%
8
 

 
1
46

   555D :


 

 %1

!#
 

 
/ 

* ;
!4 9
 
$ & 
!
0
!#
 %  

 
/ 




 %1


 

 


!4
>




!



"

#



 2
/

,",32 -+-)


-* ""

-+-,
(  ;
!4

!



"

#



  
/

)")". -+-,


-3 "+ -+-,
! < ?
!4
> - 
>


!



"

#



 2
/

,++)3 -+-,
 

-+ +* -+-,
 $ 
!4

!



"

#



 /

"".99 -+-"


"+ +* -+-) "+ ;
 
0

!#

 

 
 
!


!#
 
/ 

;?!


1
/ 

0
 ;?!
 


 
/ 

#

 
 


 
 
/ 



#
1

 




 
1

!#
1

""

( %


 
!
 


5 

  

 
1

 




!#
 
%



%
 
0 




  #





6

&-,!'
*'& 1&-

7  




-.

3,
 '

 
 %8
 G8(  
 !
 G8(