Vijay Kumar v. State Of Haryana And Others

CRM-M-38467-2023 2023:PHHC:120426

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-38467-2023 Date of Decision: 13.09.2023 Vijay Kumar ...PeƟƟoner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Sumit Sangwan, Advocate for the peƟƟoner. Mr. Rajat Gautam, Addl. A.G. Haryana.

Mr. Arjun Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 5. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

The present peƟƟon has been filed under SecƟon 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of direcƟon to the official respondents to entrust the invesƟgaƟon of case in FIR No. 210 dated 12.05.2023 under SecƟons 409, 420 IPC and 13(2), 13(1), (a) of PrevenƟon of CorrupƟon Act, 1988 Police StaƟon Narnaund, District Hansi to an independent agency or a Special InvesƟgaƟon Team.

2.

Counsel for the peƟƟoner submits that he would be contented and saƟsfied, in case he is permiƩed to file a fresh representaƟon with a Ɵme bound direcƟons to the concerned person to decide the same. 3.

Let the peƟƟoner represent the concerned Superintendent of Police/ Commissioner of Police, within two weeks from today. If the peƟƟoner files a representaƟon with in the above-menƟoned Ɵme period of two weeks, then, the same shall be decided by the concerned Superintendent of Police/ Commissioner of Police, within two months, either himself/herself or by authorizing and delegaƟng it to any officer holding IPS cadre. It is clarified that such order must be a reasoned and speaking order, and the same be communicated to the representaƟonists without delay. In the representaƟon, peƟƟoner to menƟon the email I'd of his counsel so that the concerned officer could communicate them outcome.

4.

Liberty reserved to the peƟƟoner to file fresh peƟƟon or to take other legal remedies in accordance with the law.

JYOTI 2023.09.14 08:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

CRM-M-38467-2023 2023:PHHC:120426 5.

It is clarified that there is no adjudicaƟon on merits. It is further clarified that this order shall not come in the way if the interrogaƟon of the peƟƟoner is required in any cognizable case.

6.

There would be no need for a cerƟfied copy of this order, and any Advocate for the PeƟƟoner and State can download this order and other relevant parƟculars from the official web page of this court and aƩest it to be a true copy. The concerned officer can also verify its authenƟcity and may download and use the downloaded copy for immediate use.

PeƟƟon is allowed to the extent menƟoned above. All pending applicaƟons, if any, stand disposed.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 13.09.2023 JyoƟ-II Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

JYOTI 2023.09.14 08:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.