Satpal Bansal And ORS v. State Of Punjab And ORS

I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH CWP- 7514- 2016 Dat e of deci si on: - 25. 04. 2016 Sat pal Bansal and ot her s . . . Pet i t i oner s Ver sus St at e of Punj ab and anot her . . . Respondent s CORAM: HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE S. J. VAZI FDAR, ACTI NG CHI EF JUSTI CE HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE ARUN PALLI Pr esent : - Mr . A. K. Jai n, Advocat e, f or t he pet i t i oner s.

* * * * S. J. VAZI FDAR, A. C. J. ( ORAL) The pet i t i oner s have chal l enged a not i ce dat ed 04. 01. 2016 cal l i ng upon t hem t o show cause why t he pl ot be not r esumed and why an amount 10 per cent of t he t ot al amount be not f or f ei t ed.

2.

The pet i t i oner s at t empt t o go i nt o t he account s i n suppor t of t hei r cont ent i on t hat t he amount s cl ai med by t he r espondent s ar e i n excess. Ther e i s no war r ant f or i nt er f er i ng i n our wr i t j ur i sdi ct i on. The pet i t i oner s have f i l ed a r epl y t o t he show cause not i ce. I f t he pet i t i oner s ar e aggr i eved by t he or der passed i n r espect of t he show cause not i ce, t hey ar e al ways at l i ber t y t o chal l enge t he same. 3.

The wr i t pet i t i on i s accor di ngl y di sposed of . ( S. J. VAZI FDAR) ACTI NG CHI EF JUSTI CE ( ARUN PALLI ) JUDGE

25. 04. 2016 Amodh AMODH SHARMA 2016.04.26 12:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh