Pooja Rani And Another v. State Of Punjab And Others
CRWP-10054-2021 ..1..
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-10054-2021 Date of Decision: 22.10.2021 Pooja Rani and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL
Present:
Ms. Navneet Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Saurav Khurana, DAG, Punjab.
(Through Video-conferencing) **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) The present Criminal Writ Petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for directing respondent Nos.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners. It is the case of the petitioners that they both are major inasmuch as petitioner No.1 was born on 07.04.2002 as is apparent from Aadhaar Card (Annexure P-1) and petitioner No.2 was born in 1991 as is apparent from Aadhaar Card (Annexure P-2) and have married each other on 18.10.2021, GEETA RANI 2021.10.22 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-10054-2021 ..2..
with their free consent and without any pressure and that this is their first marriage. Reliance has been placed upon the marriage Certificate (Annexure P-3) and photographs (Annexure P-4). It is also stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that a detailed representation dated 18.10.2021 (Annexure P-5) has also been given to respondent No.2 with regard to the same. Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1 to 3 only. On advance notice, Mr. Saurav Khurana, DAG, Punjab appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 and on a specific query put by this Court, he has stated that he has no objection in case, respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka, Punjab, looks into the representation dated 18.10.2021 (Annexure P-5) and takes appropriate action in accordance with law.
After considering the abovesaid facts and without commenting upon the legality of the marriage and expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the present Criminal Writ Petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to look into the representation dated 18.10.2021 (Annexure P-5) and after considering the threat perception to the petitioners, respondent No.2 will take appropriate action in accordance with law. It is, however, clarified that this order shall not debar the State from proceeding against the petitioners, if involved in any other case. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE 22.10.2021 geeta Whether reasoned/speaking?
Yes/No Whether reportable?
Yes/No GEETA RANI 2021.10.22 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document