Vipin Tyagi v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.18913 of 2026 Date of decision: July 1st, 2026 Vipin Tyagi .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others .....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA

Present:

Ms. Arzoo Modi and Mr. Sandeep Siwach, Advocates for the petitioner.

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1.

On a pointed query raised by this Court, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is not the original owner but has acquired the property subsequent to the notification dated 31.12.2013. It is submitted that since the details of the said ownership have not been mentioned in the present petition, thus, the present petition be disposed of but liberty be granted to the petitioner to revive the same after annexing the documents to show the date on which the petitioner had purchased the property in question. The petitioner would also address on the aspect as to whether the subsequent purchaser, after the notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is entitled to challenge the acquisition in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Shiv Kumar and another Versus Union of India and others reported as 2019

(10) SCC 229 and in the case of V. Chandrasekaran and another Versus Administrative Officer and others reported as 2012 (12) SCC 133. 2.

Disposed of with aforesaid liberty.

(VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE July 1st, 2026 (SUBHAS MEHLA) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.07.01 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh