Khushpinder Singh @ Pushpinder Singh v. State Of Punjab

CRM-M No.44429 of 2021 ...1...

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.203 CRM-M No.44429 of 2021 Date of Decision: 28th February, 2022.

Khushpinder Singh @ Pushpinder Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

(Heard through Video-Conferencing) CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. Rajat Malhotra, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Karanbir Singh, AAG, Punjab.

` Mr. Arshit Goyal, Advocate, for Mr. Shivam Malhotra, Advocate, for the complainant.

* * * * MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.

(ORAL) The petitioner herein has sought the relief of anticipatory bail in the criminal case arising out of the FIR bearing No.0112 dated 18.09.2021 registered at Police Station Sadar Raikot District Ludhiana Rural, under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B IPC.

Learned State counsel, on the instructions from ASI Gurmel Singh from the above-said Police Station, apprises the Court that in compliance of the order dated 25.10.2021 as passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined in the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required and he is also not involved in any other criminal case of the SEEMA SHARMA 2022.02.28 15:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M No.44429 of 2021 ...2...

similar nature.

In view of the afore-discussed submission as made by learned State counsel, the instant petition is allowed and the relief of interim bail, as extended to the petitioner named Khushpinder Singh @ Pushpinder Singh by this Court, vide the said order dated 25.10.2021, is hereby made absolute.

However, the petitioner shall continue to join in the investigation as and when required/called upon to do so and shall also strictly abide by all the conditions as laid down in Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE 28.02.2022.

seema Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes Whether Reportable?

No SEEMA SHARMA 2022.02.28 15:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document