Savita v. State Of Haryana And Others

S.No.127

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.20148 of 2022 Date of Decision:07.09.2022 Savita .....Petitioner Vs.

State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present:- Mr. Lokesh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that the petitioner was transferred vide impugned order dated 28.08.2022, a copy of which has been appended as Annexure P.1 despite the fact that the petitioner had not completed five years of service at Government Girls Sr. Sec. School, Bahu Akbarpur, District Rohtak.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while passing the order of transfer, the respondents have ignored the order passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.15108 of 2021 titled as Vikram Singh and others v. State of Haryana and others, decided on 24.08.2021, according to which respondents are to keep in mind the clause of the transfer policy, that the minimum stay of an employee at a particular station must be for a period of 5 years. Learned counsel submits that in case the petitioner has grievance with regard to transfer, the same can be raised by filing an appropriate petition before the competent authority and the same will be decided within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

RENU 2022.09.09 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No.20148 of 2022 -2Keeping in view the above, the present petition having not been pressed, the same is disposed of, with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate writ petition before the competent authority. September 07, 2022 ( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) renu JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RENU 2022.09.09 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh