Palu Alias Paluram v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-34040-2025 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-34040-2025 Date of Decision: 09.07.2025 PALU ALIAS PALURAM ... PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA ... RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- Mr. Sandeep Kotla, Advocate for the petitioner. H.S. Grewal, J.(Oral) 1.

This petition has been filed for grant of regular bail under Section 483 of BNSS in case FIR No. 237 dated 18.04.2025 under Sections 15 NDPS Act registered at Police Station Samalkha, Panipat. 2.

The case of the prosecution is that information has been received by the police that the petitioner is doing the business of Narcotics and on the basis of said information, the petitioner was arrested and 1 Kg 50 grams of poppy husk was recovered from him.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 18.04.2025.

4.

Notice of motion.

5.

Mr. Parveen Kumar Aggarwal, Addl. AG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. Learned State counsel has filed the custody certificate in the Court today, which is taken on record. As per custody Renu Rawat 2025.07.10 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-34040-2025 -2certificate, the petitioner is in custody for 02 months and 16 days. He vehemently opposes the prayer for grant of regular bail to the petitioner. He fairly admits that the petitioner is in custody since 18.04.2025 and he is not involved in any other case. He further submits that challan has been presented in the present case and trial is yet to commence. 6.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

7.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case and the fact that the petitioner is in custody for 02 months and 16 days, the continuous detention of the petitioner would not serve the ends of justice, this Court deems it a fit case to grant the concession of regular bail to the petitioner during the pendency of the trial.

8.

Therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing requisite bail bonds, surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate/Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned.

9.

It is clarified that if on bail so granted through the instant order, the petitioner is found indulging in any other criminal case it shall be open to the State to seek cancellation of his bail.

(H.S.GREWAL) 09.07.2025 JUDGE renu Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No Renu Rawat 2025.07.10 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document