← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/34222/2025dismissed

Amit Yadav & Another v. State Of Haryana

2025-07-08Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal2 pages

CRM-M No.34222 of 2025 -1-    132 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.34222 of 2025 Date of decision: 08.07.2025 Amit Yadav and Another .....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. GREWAL

Present:

Mr. Neeraj Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners.

 ***    

 1.

The petitioner is seeking quashing of order dated 02.06.2025 (Annexure P-3) and order dated 03.05.2025 (Annexure P-2) passed by learned Sessions Judge, Rewari in FIR No.96 dated 07.12.2023 under Section 379 of IPC, 1860 and Sections 21(1), 4(A) of Mines and Minerals Act, 1957 and Section 379 IPC, 1860 registered at Police Station HSEnB Police, Station Rewari whereby bail of the petitioners was cancelled and non bailable warrants have been issued quat them. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that during trial, the petitioners continued to appear but on 03.05.2025, the petitioner could not put in appearance before the trial Court as they were out of station and they had moved an application for exemption from personal appearance but their application was dismissed and their bails bonds were cancelled and were ordered to be forfeited to the State and non bailable warrants were issued against them. However, he submits that they are willing and ready to join the proceedings and shall appear before the Sonia Puri 2025.07.09 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M No.34222 of 2025 -2-   trial Court as and when required. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions further submits that the petitioners undertake to appear before the trial Court on each and every date and shall not seek any exemption for their personal appearance on any date of hearing before the trial Court. Hence, in the aforementioned facts and circumstances, the petitioners pray that directions be issued to the Trial Court that their bail application, which they would be filing on their surrender, be decided. 3.

Keeping in view the facts of the case, the service of respondent is dispensed with as it will delay the proceedings.  4.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the material placed on record.

5.

No legitimate ground to interfere in the impugned order dated 02.06.2025 is made out and the present petition is hereby, dismissed.  6.

However, in case the petitioner surrenders before the trial Court within 07 days from today at 10:00 A.M and moves an application for grant of regular bail, on his doing so, the trial Court shall consider and decide the same on the same day.

08th July, 2025 (H.S. GREWAL) Sonia Puri JUDGE  Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No  Sonia Puri 2025.07.09 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document