Samir Nayar v. State Of Punjab And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRWP-6717-2026(O&M) Date of decision: 08.06.2026 Samir Nayar ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL

Present:

Mr. Akshay Chadha, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Gorav Kathuria, DAG, Punjab.

*** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a direction to official respondents to safeguard the life and the property of the petitioner by providing adequate protection to the petitioner and his property; and further not to let the creditors and employees of the petitioner's firm, namely, Freemans Measures Pvt. Ltd. 2.

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied, in case a direction is issued to respondent No.2-the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana to decide the representation(s) dated 09.05.2026 (Annexure P-1) within a time bound manner. 3.

Without adverting to the merits of the case, the respondent No.2-the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana is directed to consider and decide the representations dated 09.05.2026 (Annexure P-1), after providing opportunity of hearing to the parties, by passing a speaking order in RAJAN 2026.06.12 11:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRWP-6717-2026(O&M) accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

4.

A copy of order so passed be supplied to the petitioner within seven days thereafter.

5.

Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. ( SANDEEP MOUDGIL ) JUDGE June 8, 2026 Rajan Whether speaking / reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No RAJAN 2026.06.12 11:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document